Governance Framework for a PE-Backed D2C Brand
This reflects the type of challenge our consultants are built to solve, drawn from real industry experience. A PE firm had invested ₹45 Cr in a fast-growing D2C brand but found that decision-making was entirely founder-driven, with no audit committee, no board-approved risk appetite, and no formal investor reporting structure. The 100-day post-investment period required a full governance uplift. The PE partner's specific concern was that two prior portfolio companies had experienced founder-investor conflict within 18 months of investment, both traceable to unclear decision rights.
A board committee structure was designed with three committees, audit, compensation, and risk, each with a charter tailored to the company's stage, not copied from a template. Decision rights were mapped across four dimensions: what the founder decides alone, what needs the CFO, what needs board notification, and what needs board approval. A monthly investor reporting pack was built, piloted for two months with the finance team before going live. A risk register was created and populated across five operational areas.
Governance framework live in 14 weeks. First board meeting under the new structure resolved three decisions that had been deadlocked for over six weeks. Twelve months in, there had been no formal founder-investor dispute, the PE partner noted the decision-rights framework had been referenced in three situations that could have escalated but didn't. One committee hadn't met as scheduled; that was flagged, not glossed over.
Related case studies.
RBI Audit Preparation for a Payment Aggregator
BRSR Report for a Listed Manufacturer
Find a Risk, Governance & Compliance consultant.
Every case study above started with a single brief. Tell us your challenge and we'll deliver the right consultant within 24 hours.
Find a Consultant